Factors Influence Sedentary Behavior Among U.S. Teenagers

Before completing this assignment, you must review all Module 5 and Module 6 content- including chapters 7-12 in the text book. Additionally, review the lectures as they include important information regarding what to include in sections V & VI of your paper.

For this assignment, you will submit one document that includes all parts of your paper! Yes, this is your final submission. As such, the following must be included: Your cover page, abstract, outline/table of contents, section 1- Introduction and Statement of Problem, section 2- Justification, section 3- Identification of relevant disciplines, section 4- Literature review, section 5- Analysis of disciplinary insights, and section 6- Reflection, and of course- your reference page(s).

Section V of your paper is NEW and should include: A table evaluating 2 of Discipline A’s insights. Choose any two of the insights you discovered when conducting your literature review. As stated in the lecture video for chapter 7- select the articles that were most helpful to you in understanding the problem from Disicpline A’s perspective. Your table should look like table 7.8 (page 192 in your textbook) I discussed this table in the chapter 7 video lecture. A second table evaluating 2 of Discipline B’s insights (follow the same instructions listed above).

A brief paragraph describing the insights discussed in your tables. How are the insights from Discipline A similar to and different from the insights from Discipline B? What are the strengths and weaknesses of these insights? This paragraph should be your evaluation of the insights offered by both of your disciplines. As such, it should be balanced. Section VI of your paper is also NEW and should include: A full paragraph discussing the “more comprehensive understanding.”

In other words, how does examining this problem through the lens of TWO disciplines, rather than one, enhance one’s understanding of the problem? Be aware of the following: The rubric for this assignment shows all expectations– please review the rubric to ensure you meet the standards Your working outline should now be a table of contents with page numbers. All parts of your paper must be present as this is your final submission! Be sure you are formatting your work correctly using the Student version APA style.Here is a guide to help you format according to APA standards: Columbia College 7th Ed. APA guide (Links to an external site.) Here is the example paper to help you format your paper properly: Example Paper- Biological and Psychological causes of obesity in the United States Download Example Paper- Biological and Psychological causes of obesity in the United States Do not write in the first person.

The words “I” “me” “my” etc. should not appear in your writing. You must use tutor.com or visit the UNA Center for Writing Excellence prior to submitting this final paper. Specifically, work on grammar/ sentence structure and APA formatting. Schedule your appointment here: Center for Writing Excellence (Links to an external site.) Rubric Full research paper with all parts Full research paper with all parts Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA compliance and all parts present 15 pts Full Marks The full paper- cover page through reference page- is APA compliant (less than 3 mistakes).

Additionally, all parts of the paper are present: Cover page, table of contents, abstract, Sections I-VI, and reference page 7 pts Partial Points Mostly APA compliant but has more than 3 errors, or, 1-2 sections of the paper are missing 0 pts No points Severe APA compliance issues. Or, more than 4 sections of the paper are missing. 15 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntro/Statement of Problem section 5 pts Full Marks Student introduces the problem and states the specific research question 2.5 pts Partial points Student has an introduction section but it lacks clarity or details 0 pts No Marks Student does not have an introduction section or the specific research question is not stated within it. 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeJustification for an

Interdisciplinary Approach 5 pts Full Marks Student justifies the use of an Interdisciplinary approach (i.e. discusses the way the problem is complex, relevant, unsolved). There is a full paragraph present to justify each discipline. 2.5 pts Partial points Student includes a justificaiton section but the section lacks details (i.e. a full paragraph for each discipline is not present, or, the student does not discuss complexity, the way the problem is current and unsolved, or the way two disciplines have insights into the problem). 0 pts No Marks Student does not include a justification section or their justification section lacks important details severely.

5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification of relevant disciplines 5 pts Full Marks Student identifies and discusses the two disciplines most relevant to the specific research problem. The student discusses each discipline’s unique contribution in detail. 2.5 pts Partial points The student identifies the two most relevant disciplines but does not discuss each discipline’s unique contribution in detail. 0 pts No Marks The student does not include an “identify relevant disciplines” section, or, this section lacks important details severely. 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLiterature Review 15 pts Full Marks The student reviewed the literature thoroughly and includes insights from both disciplines in the literature review section. The literature review addresses the specific causes of the problem from both disciplinary perspectives. 10 pts Partial Points The students includes a literature review section but that section lacks important details.

For example, the content does not include information regarding the specific causes of the problem from each disciplinary perspective. 5 pts Partial Points 2 The student includes a literature review section but that section lacks important details severely. 0 pts No Marks The student does not attempt a thorough literature review. 15 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis section 10 pts Full Marks Student includes two tables to analyze the insights from each discipline. Both tables include all required fields.

5 pts Partial points Student includes two tables to analyze the insights from each discipline. The table lacks one or more essential fields. 0 pts No Marks Student does not include two tables or those tables lack details severely. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection Section 5 pts Full Marks Student includes a reflection section discussing the way insights from two disciplines enhances ones understanding of the problem as a whole 0 pts No Marks Student does not include a reflection section, or the reflection section fails to address the way a more comprehensive understanding is achieved through an IDS approach.

5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAdequate number of peer reviewed sources 15 pts Full Marks Student includes 8-10 peer reviewed sources 7 pts Partial points Between 5-7 peer reviewed sources present 0 pts No Marks Four or fewer peer reviewed sources present 15 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Organization and clarity 10 pts Full Marks The full paper is written in a clear, organized way that allows reading with ease. 9 pts Partial points The paper lacks clarity in one or more areas 0 pts No Marks The paper lacks clarity severely 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVisited the UNA Center for Writing Excellence worked on APA formatting AND grammar/ sentence structure 15 pts Full Marks Visited UNA Center for Writing Excellence 0 pts No Marks Did not visit with UNA Center for Writing Excellence 15 pts Total Points: 100