Court Systems in the United States
Table of Contents
Introduction
The courts in the United States are divided into three different levels (Hawks et al., 2020). The subordinate in the system known as District Courts, while those at the top of the court system are referred so as Circuit Courts. Federal cases start in the U.S. District Justice, while state cases are tried by state trial courts. A decision to appeal a ruling is enshrined within the laws of U.S and that happens at the Supreme Court the highest organ in the court system (Jones, 2018).
The U.S. Supreme is the highest court, and it hears cases of a federal nature. Constitutionally the court system is enshrined and well documented in the constitution of the U.S (Rebbe, 2018). In general, each level has its own Supreme Court and appellate court. Unlike the federal courts, state systems have more local courts with specialized jurisdiction. Depending on the state, these local courts include family, probate, and traffic court. Each court has its own judges, and a majority of the judges will decide the case. In most states, the courts are organized by county. In addition to hearing appeals from inferior courts, the superior courts also have original jurisdiction for serious crimes and major civil lawsuits. These courts are where the majority of the nation’s jury trials take place. The federal courts are composed of the Supreme and appellate courts. The Chief Justice of each state is elected by the people, and the eight associate justices serve as its lower-court counterparts. The Supreme Court hears cases in which the lower courts have failed to properly give a ruling on matters brought before them. If the lower courts cannot rule correctly, the case may be sent to the highest level for proper ruling (Sawyer and Wagner, 2019). However, the cases heard that determined at the Supreme Court are few in number per year, this is despite the fact that they play key role in the day-to-day operations of government they tend to be overshadowed by other government agencies.
The court system in the United States is comprised of two levels (Martin et al., 2018). The lower courts are called trial courts. The higher courts are the appellate courts. They are independent from the government and are not responsible for the decisions of the other branches of the court. Whether a state is ruled right is dependent on the type of ruling it issues. A state’s Supreme Court is often responsible for determining a case’s legal merit (Martin et al., 2018) The highest court in the country is the U.S. Supreme Court. It has the power to overturn the decisions of other lower courts. It is the final court in the United States. A state’s Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States. When a state does not comply with its constitutional or other laws, the Supremes may intervene. It is not a law, but a decision can be overturned by a higher court.
The US Judicial Systems
The United States’ judicial system comprises of three branches: executive, legislative, and the courts (Howard, 2014).. The two branches are elected by the people, while the judiciary is a Presidential appointee and approved by the Senate. In U.S.A, the highest court hears appeals of lower court decisions. It is an intermediate federal appellate court that operates under mandatory review. In some cases, Congress issued out appellate jurisdiction to specialized courts, for instance the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review (Fix and Kassow, 2020). The federal courts of appeals conduct its hearings in 13 permanently appellate circuits; several other federal courts have the title but are not considered to sit in an appellate circuit. There are three levels of federal courts. Federal courts are governed by statutes, and district courts are typically confined to a single state or group of states (Smith, 2021). The District Courts are the lowest court, and their decisions can be appealed only if there has been a legal error on the part of the lower court. The Supremes are the highest court in the country (Frankfurter et al., 2017) There are also several lower courts, including the California Supreme and New York Supreme Courts.
The federal courts are divided into three levels (Frankfurter et al., 2017). The lower level is called the District Court. The circuit court is the first level of appeal. The Supreme Court is the last level of appeal. The courts are composed of nine justices. Each District Court is made up of two to 28 judges. In each state, there are 13 Appellate Courts, and each has its own court. The federal judiciary is made up of the state’s lower-level courts, as well as the states’ trial courts (Frankfurter et al., 2017). The US judicial system consists of three tiers. The first two are trial courts, and the third is the Supreme Court. The lower court decides the case, and the lower court is then allowed to appeal to the next higher level. The highest court hears appeals only when a judge has made a legal error. If the lower-level courts have ruled in favor of the lower-level courts, then the party in question may appeal to the next level. The federal judicial system is composed of three tiers (Howard, 2014). The district courts are the highest courts, and are governed by the Constitution.
The district courts are the lower-level counterparts of the state’s Supreme Court. Most cases are filed in the lower court, and the highest Court decides the matter (Smith, 2021) The appeals process is complicated in nature, so the best way to get the most out of it is to seek legal advice. The US court system is divided into three tiers. The lower court, known as the District Court, is where a case is filed. The higher court, which has the power to make an appeal, decides on the legality of the case. The federal courts are responsible for reviewing the law. The lower courts are responsible for determining constitutional issues, and the Supreme Court is the ultimate arbiter in federal matters (Hinton et al., 2018).
Qualifications
As a matter of law, the sensitivity, the part involved in the nomination and confirmation of Supreme Court justices is closely watched by the press, the federal government, humanitarian agencies among other groups (Fix and Kassow, 2020). Intense lobbying is involved to either reject or approve the individuals presented. A senate committee on judicial matters conducts hearings and interviews to ascertain the eligibility of all candidates to determine whether they can serve in the corridors of justice. The first candidate to appear for the post to appear before the committee was Harlan Fiske Stone way back in 1925, leading to the entrenching of the practice of questioning due to the appointment of John Marshall Harlan II (Howard, 2014). The qualifications and appointment of seats in the US court system are very complex, with several factors to consider. First of all, judicial positions are not appointed for life. A judge may be nominated to serve a life term or a limited term (Smith, 2021). In the past, people have appealed to a higher court, but that is rare. A judge has lifetime tenure and can resign. Congress creates district court judgeships and court of appeals judgeships, and a president appoints the most senior judges (Howard, 2014). The Judicial Conference surveys each state’s needs and recommends nominees every two years. One of the key factors in determining the number of senior judges in a state is the average weighted filings per judgeship. Geographic areas and the type of cases may determine the number of senior judges in the state.
The Execution Process
The Supreme Court is the highest court in the country and has the mandate to hear and make rulings appeals on all questions of law (Mauer, 2018). While the court typically does not hold trials, its main function is to interpret the law and decide how it applies to individual cases. When the accused commits a crime, the court will decide whether the law applies to the facts and what sentence is appropriate (Purba et al., 2020). If the defendant is convicted, they will be placed in the correctional system. The Judicial System in the United States comprises of three levels of courts. The subordinate courts try cases and decide on the merits of the case if one is innocent or guilty. One can seek for review or appeal the given decision but it entirely lies on facts presented to it. And that power rests with The Supreme Court (Cunneen and Tauri, 2019). While this power is discretionary, it is final. The justices study the record of the lower courts and consider the questions of law that were raised. The appellate courts hear appeals on civil cases involving individuals, businesses, partnerships, or government entities. The U.S the court system constitutes of two levels of appeals, the first level being the trial court. It hears appeals on criminal convictions and sentences, while the appellate courts handle cases involving appeals. The lower courts also hear cases involving the death penalty. While the highest court has the final say, the lower courts have a say on ensuring the enforceability of the laws (Bartos and Kubrin, 2018).
Based on the structure the Supreme Court lies at the top and is basically by fact the final and most important organ within the U.S judicial system. It is the final level of appeals in the justice system. The lower courts usually do not consider suits challenging execution methods (Klein, 2020). In Baze v. Rees, the Supreme Court upheld the lethal injection method. It is important to understand the role of the higher courts. It is a critical component of the legal system and a crucial part of our democracy. On matters such as capital punishment the Supreme Court has the final authority when making determination on a matter brought before it. In the United States, death penalty is only imposed if the accused has committed a crime (Latzer, 2010). The accused must prove that he or she caused a crime. The accused’s sentence is determined by a jury, which is made by the judge. The defendant’s attorney must present evidence of the alleged crime.
The court system is responsible for enforcing the law. For instance, the courts of a state may not execute an innocent person unless it is in their interests (Keren, 2020). In the United States, a defendant’s rights to appeal the decision are protected by the Supreme Court in some states. In addition to the death penalty, there are other laws that govern the execution process. The right to appeal a sentence is not guaranteed in all cases, and it must be noted that some states have strict rules about executions (Purba et al., 2020) In the United States, a jury can determine whether a death penalty case should be tried. The court has broad jurisdiction in criminal cases, for instance it has the capacity to delay the implementation on a death sentence if there are aggravating factors. The right to a jury’s decision can protect an innocent person, but it is not guaranteed in all cases (Latzer, 2010). The constitutional protections against the death penalty are in place.
The judicial system in the United States is made up of three main parts. The Supreme Court tries actual cases and is based on the provisions of the Constitution. While the highest organ has the supreme jurisdiction over criminal cases, states also have courts of appeals (Frankfurter et al., 2017). A person may appeal a case if he or she thinks it was unfair and the victim was the one who suffered from the wrongdoing. In cases involving death penalty, the top organ the judicial system automatically files an appeal of the case. In the majority of cases, the Supremes will overturn the trial court’s ruling. While this may seem unjust, it is the rule in most jurisdictions. In the United States, all criminals who commit a capital offense face the risk of death (Klein, 2020).
Conclusion
There are many different functions of the judicial system, whether federal or state. One of these functions is to decide what happened, whether it was a crime, and what the appropriate punishment is. This process allows for a peaceful resolution of disputes (Mauer, 2018). Both federal and state courts hear cases, but federal courts have more jurisdiction, while state courts have fewer. Here’s an overview of how each works. The federal judiciary is divided into four main branches: the Supreme Court, district courts, and district courts. Federal courts have the same general purpose as state courts: they decide on constitutionality, treaties, and more (Frankfurter et al., 2017). These courts hear cases involving the president, ambassadors, and U.S. citizens. The federal judiciary has separate jurisdiction and sometimes cooperates with the executive and legislative branches. It decides on the constitutionality of a law and makes rules for its enforcement. The federal courts usually are the last resort when a case goes to court.
The courts of appeals are the last option when seeking legal redress. The federal court hears appeals from state and district courts (Casillas et al., 2011). These appeals are usually related to the constitutionality of a statute. Appellate courts usually hear disputes concerning the federal laws. The final ruling on such serious matters brought before the court lie with the Supreme Court, in cases touching on its jurisdictional operational limits. The Supremes hear most of the cases that are not based on factual issues, and are responsible for determining the legality of a statute. The judiciary of each state has multiple levels. In a federal system, there are two levels of appeals. A lower court hears lower court decisions, and an intermediate appellate court hears appeals from the lower courts. An appellate court hears and determines cases from a senior court (Casillas et al., 2011). In both states, there’s a Supreme Court in which Appeals from the lower courts are heard and determinations given.
The federal and state judicial systems differ in the way they function. Both systems have two types of courts. Appellate courts hear cases brought by the government. The courts of the lower levels are known as trial courts, and the Supreme Courts listens to appeals. They are the final courts in any case. In a state, the state’s Supreme Court can rule on any matter that has not been decided by the lower court. The federal courts hear cases that arise from constitutional issues. Appeals can be based on geographic jurisdiction or subject matter (Sawyer and Wagner, 2019). In the US, the Supreme Court has the constitutional role and authority to make changes the laws of the country. While there are many other branches of government, the federal courts remain the largest judicial system in the world. The judges of the United States serve life terms and are often referred to as ‘judges’.
References
Bartos, B. J., and Kubrin, C. E. (2018). Can we downsize our prisons and jails without compromising public safety? Findings from California’s Prop 47. Criminology & Public Policy, 17(3), 693-715.
Casillas, C. J., Enns, P. K., and Wohlfarth, P. C. (2011). How public opinion constrains the US Supreme Court. American Journal of Political Science, 55(1), 74-88.
Cunneen, C., and Tauri, J. M. (2019). Indigenous peoples, criminology, and criminal justice. Annual Review of Criminology, 2, 359-381.
Fix, M. P., and Kassow, B. J. (2020). US Supreme Court Doctrine in the State High Courts. Cambridge University Press.
Frankfurter, F., Landis, J. M., and Stevens, R. G. (2017). The business of the Supreme Court: A study in the federal judicial system. Routledge.
Hawks, L., Woolhandler, S., and McCormick, D. (2020). COVID-19 in prisons and jails in the United States. JAMA Internal Medicine, 180(8), 1041-1042.
Hinton, E., Henderson, L., and Reed, C. (2018). An unjust burden: The disparate treatment of black Americans in the criminal justice system. Vera Institute of Justice, 1-20.
Howard, J. W. (2014). Courts of Appeals in the federal judicial system. Princeton University Press.
Jones, A. (2018). Correctional control 2018: Incarceration and supervision by state. Prison Policy Initiative. Press Release.
Keren, H. (2020). Divided and Conquered: The Neoliberal and Emotional Consequences of the Arbitration Revolution. Fla. L. Rev., 72, 575.
Klein, A. L. (2020). Nondelegating Death. Ohio St. LJ, 81, 923.
Latzer, B. (2010). Death penalty cases: Leading US Supreme Court cases on capital punishment. Elsevier.
Martin, K. D., Sykes, B. L., Shannon, S., Edwards, F., and Harris, A. (2018). Monetary sanctions: Legal financial obligations in US systems of justice. Annual Review of Criminology, 1, 471-495.
Mauer, M. (2018). Long-term sentences: Time to reconsider the scale of punishment. UMKC L. Rev., 87, 113.
Purba, N., Tanjung, A. M., Pramono, R., and Purwanto, A. (2020). Death Penalty and Human Rights in Indonesia. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9, 1356-1362.
Sawyer, W., and Wagner, P. (2019). Mass incarceration: The whole pie 2019. Prison policy initiative, 19.
Smith, S. R. (2021). A Pandemic Term With “Highly Charged Issues”: The US Supreme Court 2020-2021. Journal of health service psychology, 47(4), 207-227.