Nature-Based Interaction on Emotional Well-being
Question 1
Tillmann et al. (2018) performed study by using 10 academic databases to systematically discover and analyze researchers’ research papers from 1990 to 2017. According to this review study on psychology assignment, about 30 out of 35 research publications concerned with the notion of interaction and emotional well-being. Their review study found that the type of the encounter affected students’ emotional well-being. The emotional well-being of students was dependent on their emotional health, issues, moods, and IQ in 15 articles. However, the subjective character of the research, which did not provide a clear response, was a weakness of this study.
Verran et al. (2018) conducted another study on students’ mental health, taking into account 5 databases from which 6 research articles focused on the inclusion of students’ mental health. In addition, two groups of students aged 12 to 25 were questioned by chat room, videoconference, and telephone. The researchers discovered that the influence of communication through technology gadgets was successful in enhancing students’ mental health via this trial. The study, however, did not provide enough medical data to establish the good influence of electronic contact on students’ mental health.
The third study article by Asrar et al. (2018) examines the influence of the teacher-student contact on the students’ emotional and mental health. Students from three departments at the University of Karachi were given a questionnaire with ten questions for this study. The students’ responses suggested that communication between professors and students was critical in motivating them to attain their objectives. The study also demonstrates the impact of communication and engagement on student productivity.
For their investigation, the researchers used quantitative approaches and both primary and secondary data sources. Despite the fact that numerous forms of study have been conducted on nature-based contact and emotional well-being, there are no consistent findings, and the researchers’ conclusions are insignificant, necessitating more rigorous and in-depth research.
Question 2
The study topic is whether nature-based engagement has a harmful or good influence on children’s emotional well-being.
Question 3
It is expected that a well-planned and excellent nature-based interaction will have a beneficial influence on the children’s emotional well-being, while a badly designed nature-based contact would have a negative impact on the children’s emotional well-being.
Question 4
The kind and type of interactions the youngsters experience in their daily lives are the independent variable or IV in this study. A youngster may participate in three sorts of interactions: student-content interaction, online discussion, and student-instructor engagement. Analytical methods, theories, and algorithms will be used to calculate the interaction rate and engagement. Different statistical formulae may be utilized to efficiently quantify the independent factors of interaction’s influence on emotional well-being (Tekin et al., 2018). The outcomes of this computation will be numerical, which may be used to determine the efficacy of the engagement. The children’s emotional well-being is the dependent variable in this study. This is a dependent variable since the children’s emotional well-being is influenced by their interactions with others. Children’s emotional well-being may be assessed via interviews, self-reports, and personality tests. All of these tests must provide qualitative findings that can be examined to determine if the nature-based encounter has a good or negative influence.
Question 5
This study’s suggested participants will be 60 youngsters aged 12 to 20 years old, 30 of whom will be girls and 30 of whom will be males. A modest sample size is essential since a big sample size might generate confusion, and this will be determined using priori power analysis. When alpha is supplied and the power is ES, this may be found by calculating N (60 children). In light of the current COVID-19 laws, which impose mobility limitations, 60 randomly chosen youngsters will get a questionnaire through online channels.
The questionnaire will comprise a rating scale and multiple-choice questions by response, to which the children will react in order to answer the relevant questions for this study. The questionnaire will include a question on factors of emotional well-being and determinants of emotional health in children.
The advantage of this recruiting tactic is that the youngsters may remain at home and respond to the questions online, which is quicker than conventional survey methods (Mahmutovic, 2020). In addition, the rating scale questions will enable students to assess the factor and influence of contact on their emotional well-being. The disadvantage of this technique is that it does not guarantee that all 60 chosen people will respond to the questionnaire. In addition, for a better comprehension, literate reviews and publications of other scholars will be considered.
Question 6
Prior to participation, participants will be emailed a consent form, which they may sign if they agree to take part in the research project. This will confirm that the study was carried out ethically and with the participants’ complete permission. The consent form will also provide authorization for the participant’s information to be utilized to the maximum extent possible for research purposes. Along with that, it will provide the participant the authority to take action if their information or replies are used unlawfully or unethically, and the participants’ identities will be kept anonymous. After the participant has completed the consent form, they will be sent the questionnaire, which they must complete and return within 10 days of receiving it. Every three days, a mail reminder will be issued to participants to remind them to return the questionnaire.
Question 7
The purpose of this study is to look at the effect of nature-based contact on children’s emotional well-being. This implies that the relationship between the contact and emotional well-being must be calculated. The correlation test will be performed to determine the reliance of the two variables. The correlation test will enable researchers to assess how nature-based contact affects children’s emotional well-being. A correlation test is a statistical method for determining the strength of a relationship between two variables (Ganti, 2019). A correlation test’s results range from -1 to 1; if the computed values fall within this range, the hypothesis is accepted. If the estimated result is less than -1 or more than 1, the hypothesis is rejected.
The correlation test is best suited for this study since it involves two variables: interaction and emotional well-being. This study is based on the notion that interaction is the primary main element influencing children’s emotional well-being. This is because it is critical to make interaction a prominent element in determining the emotional well-being of children in order to assess and discover the influence of contact on emotional well-being.
Question 8
Internal validity is jeopardized when the number of test participants is not equal and there are same factors connected to the topic. In this study, the youngsters are separated into two groups based on gender, with 30 participants in each group. The group composition effect is the internal validity threat in this study, and it may be mitigated by having additional volunteers on hand. This is because if any of the group’s members withdraw from the study, the reserve person may be added.
Question 9
The external validity of the study is the degree to which the findings may be generalized. The external examines the research findings’ relevance in a broader context and assesses whether the results can be utilized to explore related issues (Cuncic, 2020). This study may be used to assess the influence of contact on the emotional well-being of children aged 12 to 20 years. However, because to the age restriction, the study cannot be utilized to analyze the influence of contact on the emotional well-being of students seeking higher education.
Question 10
Objectivity is an ethical concern that may arise when planning and conducting this study (Niaz, 2017). This is because, in addition to the interview, the journal publications will be considered. This opens the door for a literature study of known persons to be conducted, or for known people to be chosen for the survey. People usually prefer authors they are acquainted with because they are simpler to understand. Because of the possibility of selecting journals and reviews of well-known researchers and persons for participation in the poll, this might raise ethical concerns about objectivity. To remedy this problem, the pre-concept and business will be scrapped, and a random sample of journals will be chosen for evaluation. The selection of participants and publications at random will guarantee that the study is impartial and devoid of bias. As a result, the Human Research Ethics Committee will be satisfied with this addressing step.
References
Asrar, Z., Tariq, N., & Rashid, H. (2018). The Impact of Communication Between Teachers and Students: A Case Study of the Faculty of Management Sciences, University of Karachi, Pakistan. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 14(16), 32. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2018.v14n16p32
Cuncic, A. (2020). Understanding Internal and External Validity. Verywell Mind. https://www.verywellmind.com/internal-and-external-validity-4584479 Ganti, A. (2019). Correlation Coefficient Definition. Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/correlationcoefficient.asp
Mahmutovic, J. (2020). 7 Advantages of Online Surveys (and 3 Disadvantages). SurveyLegend. https://www.surveylegend.com/online-survey/advantages-of-online-surveys/ Niaz, M. (2017). Understanding Objectivity in Research Reported in the Journal Science & Education (Springer). Evolving Nature of Objectivity in the History of Science and its Implications for Science Education, [online] 46, pp.37–77. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7120885/ [Accessed 23 Apr. 2021].
Tekin, E., Yeh, P. J., & Savage, V. M. (2018). General Form for Interaction Measures and Framework for Deriving Higher-Order Emergent Effects. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2018.00166
Tillmann, S., Tobin, D., Avison, W., & Gilliland, J. (2018). Mental health benefits of interactions with nature in children and teenagers: a systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 72(10), 958–966. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2018-210436
Verran, A., Uddin, A., Court, R., Taggart, F., Sutcliffe, P., Sturt, J., Griffiths, F., & Atherton, H. (2018). Effectiveness and impact of networked communication interventions in young people with mental health conditions: A rapid review. DIGITAL HEALTH, 4, 205520761876220. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207618762209