The society of the Labradorians is very different from the neighboring nations of the Philippines and Tonga in regards to the exploitation of environmental capital available.

The society of the Labradorians is very different from the neighboring nations of the Philippines and Tonga in regards to the exploitation of environmental capital available. It is mentioned in the records by openers that the community of Labrador was founded on collective living until the fur trade increased the level of hunting and trapping that went out of control. Even after the division of private parcels of land, the hunters were allowed to hunt on other people’s land if they left behind the pelt. The tribe found a way to meet their needs, and they worked together to create a mutually beneficial game. Our following example contrasts with our communal property arrangement. In the Philippines and Tonga Islands, it is not easy to control the excessive bleaching and blasting of fish because two main factors are inhibiting this process. My “sucker” theory is the first thing that comes to mind. Those who damaged the reef and fishing were able to provide an extra source of income for their families, while those who practiced sustainable fishing were unable to earn enough money to meet their own needs.

Openers agreed with responders that by ensuring that only landowners are permitted to hunt the animals for their fur, the land in Labrador changed. The only thought in their minds had been food and life on the reef. To make sure everyone had enough to eat, everyone had to bleach or blast their fish. Only if no bleach fishing or blast fishing is performed on the reef can it be saved. Nonetheless, plotting a plot without bounding lines would have been extremely difficult. In one story, cleaning the fish wouldn’t hurt the reef, but it could damage it in another.

Gifford Pinchot and Aldo Leopold recommended harnessing environmental capital, but their approaches differed. The environmental resource proposed by Gifford Pinchot is essential to the human if it is employed. Schmidtz’s ideas are in agreement with these perspectives. Aldo Leopold did not hold a position on the subject. His argument aims to integrate human socioeconomic and environmental needs. The theoretical aspects of environmental ethics are brought to life through Schmidtz’s innovative approaches.