Why Conventional learning is Convenient
Why Conventional learning is Convenient
“In periods where minor instructor-led schoolrooms are likely to be the exception, e-
learning resolutions are believed to provide extra association and communication with
professionals and colleagues” (McCutcheon et al., 255). A raging debate continues to ensue
in regards to what form of learning is convenient between conventional and online learning.
Conversely, conventional mode of learning remains vital in conveying knowledge to
students. Although it seems fit to adjust the education style to keep up with the technological
advancements, online learning is not beneficial as classroom learning.
Reasons why it is Convenient
Foremost, the need for physical interactions between the tutors and learners enhances
outcome efficiency. The conventional style of learning presents productive dynamic relations
amongst the teachers and learners, hence increasing efficiency in education. Teachers’
presence presents the opportunity to students effortlessly grasp content and be attentive
paralinguistic aspects during lectures.
Conventional knowledge offers learners a chance to seek interpretations of
concurrently during an ongoing lesson. A student can pose queries if one feels there is a
misinterpretation or imprecision. In turn, a teacher can address the elicited issues, making the
sessions co-operative and understandable in contrast to online learning (Wasserman 132).
Business entities frequently the state of their desire to employ graduates with had more
interactive abilities. This makes traditional education a possible manner of education that
improves education values as compared to online education.
According to Son, conventional learning is believed to be an enormous gain for each
learner as enhances the level of interaction amongst themselves (305). Increased
collaboration between students advances the dissemination of knowledge. This may be
achieved in various modes as open class gatherings. With every learner that may exhibit
discrete flaws and strong points, group interactions empower weak students. Aside from
educational aid, learners can conquer societal problems that contribute to being a proficient
learner. As a result, the existence of socialization progresses learners’ capabilities in contrast
to online learning and improves their psychological development.
Conclusion
Conventional learning is regarded as more efficient than online learning. With
conventional education, it improves effectiveness in the education results, presents
opportunities to seek interpretation and advanced interaction amongst fellow students. It
offers access to quality and suitable information. Online learning is only contemplated for
convenience and not efficiency.
Works Cited
McCutcheon, Karen, et al. "A systematic review evaluating the impact of online or blended
learning vs. face‐to‐face learning of clinical skills in undergraduate nurse education." Journal of
advanced nursing 71.2 (2015): 255-270.
Wasserman, Egoza, and Ruth Migdal. "Professional Development: Teachers' Attitudes in
Online and Traditional Training Courses." Online Learning 23.1 (2019): 132-143.
Son, Barbara, and Mark SiMonian. "An integrated multimedia learning model vs. the
traditional face-to-face learning model: An examination of college economics
classes." Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 25.4 (2016): 305-321.