Critically assess Immanuel Kant’s epistemological alternative to Hume’s Fork

Please write an essay in which you critically assess Immanuel Kant’s epistemological alternative to Hume’s Fork. Your essay should consist of three parts. In the first part of the paper you will state Hume’s Fork and explain how Hume uses this “fork” to draw skeptical conclusions with respect to induction and/or causality. Be sure to define all key terms. Then, in the second part of the paper, you will explain why Kant thinks that the introduction of synthetic apriori knowledge and the so-called “Copernican Revolution of the Mind” provide an epistemological model that is superior to Hume’s Fork. Finally, in third part of the paper, you will defend your main thesis and critically evaluate Kant’s epistemological position.

Please respond in 1800 -1900 words with MLA citation,